Skip to content
R
roispends.
[ Studio 01 — Brand Strategy ]

Most brand strategy decks are decorated PowerPoint.

Founders pay for purpose statements that don't shape a single ad headline. We build positioning that holds up when a paid-social buyer needs a hook, when a journalist needs an angle, and when a sales rep needs a one-liner. The output is a working document, not a wall poster.

Starts at
$25–45K
project-priced
Timeline
4–6 weeks
end-to-end
Engagement
Project
scope-locked
Senior-only
100%
no junior pods
[ TL;DR ]

What we run.

  • 01Stakeholder interviews — founders, sales, support, churned customers
  • 02Quantitative segment sizing + named ICPs (primary / secondary / not-this)
  • 03Competitive frame mapping — axes, not logo walls

Full surface area below ↓

[ Diagnostic ]

Where most brand strategies die quietly.

Brand work fails for predictable reasons. Here's what we see most — and how we engineer around it.

Positioning isn't a headline, it's a frame

If your positioning can't generate ten distinct ad headlines, it isn't positioning. It's an aspiration. We pressure-test it against actual creative before we sign off on the doc.

The audience is too broad to be useful

“DTC shoppers aged 28–45” is not a segment. Buyer-led teams need named primary, secondary, and de-prioritised segments — with the trade-off explicit, not implied.

Competitive frame is a logo wall

Most decks list competitors without naming the axis the brand is choosing to win on. We force a single sentence: when the buyer sees X and Y, we want them to choose us because of Z.

Strategy never reaches the operator

The strategy lives in a 90-page deck the media buyer has never opened. The fix isn't a shorter deck — it's a one-pager the team works from daily, with the deck behind it for context.

[ Surface area ]

What we run.

Senior-only delivery. The strategist, identity lead, and writer on your project have all shipped at scale.

Stakeholder interviews — founders, sales, support, churned customers
Quantitative segment sizing + named ICPs (primary / secondary / not-this)
Competitive frame mapping — axes, not logo walls
Positioning statement + variants (long, short, ad-headline, sales-line)
Narrative arc — origin, problem, why-now, why-us, why-this
Strategic guardrails — what we will and won't say
Working one-pager + full strategic doc behind it
Operator briefings — paid, content, sales, recruiting
[ Method ]

Four weeks. One artifact you'll use weekly..

Project-priced. Scope-locked. Senior operators from kickoff to handoff.

01

Listen wide

Interviews with founders, top sellers, support, top buyers, and recently-churned. We're hunting for the language the market actually uses, not the language the founder wishes it used.

02

Frame sharply

Segment-of-one analysis. Named ICPs with trade-off language. Competitive axis mapping with one-sentence why-us per segment.

03

Stress-test against output

Before we sign off, we draft three sample ads, two PR angles, and one sales script using the strategy. If the strategy doesn't make these easier to write, it isn't done.

04

Operationalise

30-minute briefings with each operator team. Strategy lives in a notion doc + one-pager, not a deck on a shared drive nobody opens.

[ What you get ]

Concrete deliverables. Nothing vague.

Working artifacts your team uses weekly — not glossy decks parked on a shared drive.

  • 01Positioning statement + 4 variants (one-liner, ad headline, sales line, investor line)
  • 02Named ICPs with primary / secondary / de-prioritised tiers
  • 03Competitive frame map with chosen axis
  • 04Brand narrative arc (origin → why-now → why-us → why-this)
  • 05Strategic guardrails — say / don't say
  • 06Working one-pager (the artifact your team uses)
  • 07Full strategy document (the source-of-truth behind it)
  • 08Operator briefing decks per team (paid, content, sales)
[ Questions ]

What founders ask before signing.

Can you do this without redoing our identity?

Yes — and often we recommend it. Strategy first, identity second. If positioning shifts, identity needs to shift; doing identity first locks you in.

How do you handle disagreement among founders?

We interview separately, surface the disagreement explicitly in week 2, and force a decision before week 3. Strategy without resolved disagreement is theatre.

What if our market is changing fast?

Then strategy needs a refresh cycle. We bake in a 6-month checkpoint and a 12-month full revisit. Static strategy is a luxury for static markets.

Will you bring data, or do we provide it?

Both. We pull market and competitive data ourselves; you provide internal customer, sales, and churn data. If you don't have it, we'll surface that as a gap before scoping.

[ Take the first move ]

Two ways in.
Both low-risk.

Option AHighest signal

Start a brand project

Tell us about the project, the deadline, the budget band, and the stage. We'll come back in 24h with a scope, a proposed team, and a kickoff slot. No pitch deck. No procurement gauntlet.

  • 5-step inquiry — under 4 minutes
  • Scope + team proposal in 24h
  • Senior operators from kickoff
  • Project-priced, scope-locked
Option BLowest friction

30-min discovery.
No slides.

Walk us through where the brand is and what you're trying to ship. We'll surface the real constraint and the honest scope on the call. No follow-up sequences, no pitch deck.

  • 30 minutes max
  • Honest scope estimate live
  • Specific recommendation, even if not us
  • Zero follow-up sequences